Case study · Automotive

Four procurement workflows, from scoped use case to production

AI-assisted tendering and contracting for a global automotive group: drafting requests for proposals, evaluating proposals against predefined criteria and negotiating contracts through template exchanges, integrated with the procurement systems and used in production by the process owners.

Client engagement · via Jaden Data / entAIngine Production

Mandate

Led four projects end to end, from proof of concept through embedding into internal tendering and contracting processes to production use by the process owners; accountable for design quality and for delivering to the customer's expectations.

Key decisions

  1. Split the process into four projects, each with its own process owner and a twelve-week cycle, instead of one large programme.
  2. Raise the alignment cadence from bi-weekly to weekly and run parallel sub-groups, so stakeholder dependencies never blocked delivery.
  3. Integrate with the existing procurement systems and AI infrastructure through tailored input masks and APIs, with vector databases over historical tenders and contracts.

Outcome — measured

4 workflows taken from proof of concept to a production MVP
Weekly stakeholder cadence with parallel sub-groups Qualitative
Stakeholders
  • Procurement process owners (tendering, evaluation, contracting)
  • IT and AI infrastructure teams
  • A delivery partner
  • Executive sponsors
Constraints
  • A large landscape of stakeholders owning different parts of the process
  • Integration into existing procurement systems and AI services
  • Enterprise security and data requirements
Reuse
  • Procurement integration patterns
  • Prompted workflows for RFP drafting, proposal evaluation and negotiation templates
  • Engineering enablement for the client's teams on AI-assisted development

Context

A global automotive group runs tendering and contracting at scale, across a large landscape of internal stakeholders who each own a different part of the process. As AI supplier through Jaden Data, I led a series of four projects embedded into those internal processes.

Business problem

Defining tender conditions, writing requests for proposals, evaluating proposals against predefined rules and negotiating contracts through iterative template exchanges between buyer and supplier consumed expert time and varied in quality from case to case.

My mandate

I designed the solution architecture and the AI processes, wrote the prompts for the workflows, and led the four projects end to end, from proof of concept through embedding into the internal processes to production use by the process owners.

Decisions

  • Four projects, each a proof of concept first and then embedded into the process, each targeting one subsection (template generation, proposal evaluation, contract negotiation and related steps), each on a twelve-week cycle of six two-week sprints followed by go-live.
  • A custom web interface tailored to the procurement workflows, integrated through tailored input masks and APIs, with vector databases over historical tenders and contracts for reference.
  • Alignment cadence raised from bi-weekly to weekly with parallel sub-groups, so no single dependency could stall progress.

Delivery

Each project worked directly with its process owner group, who later used the application in production. The platform connected to the group’s existing AI services for compatibility and scale.

Delivery shape
  1. Scoped — Use case per workflow (tendering and contracting)
  2. 12 weeks — Per-project cycle (six two-week sprints, then go-live)
  3. Weekly — Alignment cadence (raised from bi-weekly, split into sub-groups)
  4. Production — Four workflows live (in the client environment)

Outcome

An MVP deployed to production, with key steps of tendering and contracting automated and the process owners using the applications.

An MVP deployed to production, with key steps of tendering and contracting automated and the process owners using the applications.

Reuse

The integration patterns and the prompted workflows carried into later procurement work; the same client’s engineering teams were later onboarded to AI-assisted development with security standards and MCP practices.

Evidence

Project count, cycle length and cadence are project records; efficiency gains are the process owners’ qualitative assessment and are not quantified here.

Want the same thing done in your environment?

This case is one of several. If the shape looks like your problem, the fastest route is to send me the constraints you cannot move.

Remote-first, on-site when it matters; NDA on request